US: US offers trade deal or ‘revenge tax’ to global partners

US trade partners have the opportunity to avoid the so-called “revenge tax” promoted by President Donald Trump — if they agree to strike deals with Washington. The White House is effectively pressuring its partners to do so, said White House National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett, according to Bloomberg.

Hassett noted that the so-called Section 899, included in Trump’s tax bill, could be waived for certain countries if they “issue policy pronouncements today or tomorrow.” In other words, Hassett added, if they sign trade agreements with Washington and eliminate digital service taxes as well as taxes on American goods and services.

The outlet points out that it is highly unlikely dozens of countries will suddenly remove digital service taxes — at least not before Congress passes Trump’s bill. These taxes enjoy strong political support, particularly in European countries.

Trump’s tax bill also targets countries that have introduced a minimum 15% tax on foreign goods and services. However, Washington may soon find that things are not so simple: even if trade partners agree to scrap these taxes, the process will take months at best.

“We’re in negotiations over tax issues, and those tax issues that we negotiate affect the trade deals as well… We’re going to finish the tax business and then there are going to be a lot of deals signed right after that,” Hassett assured.

What is the “revenge tax”?
The “revenge tax” refers to increased taxes on foreign investors and companies from countries that, according to the White House, unfairly tax US-based firms. This mainly targets nations like Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom, France, and others that impose so-called digital service taxes on major American tech companies — such as Meta Platforms (which owns Facebook), Google, and others.

Trump’s tax bill containing this measure is currently under review in the US Congress. He is pushing for it to be passed by July 4, although that appears unlikely due to a number of controversial provisions that are still being debated.

US-Europe trade war
The issue of trade tariffs became a major point on the global agenda following Donald Trump’s return to power in the United States. Starting in March 2025, the US imposed 25% tariffs on cars, steel, and aluminum from the European Union, followed by 20% tariffs in April on other EU goods.

Afterward, the US reduced the tariffs to 10% and expressed readiness to begin negotiations by July 8 on mutual tariff removals, tax relief, or favorable trade deals. In response, the EU’s 27 member states suspended their own planned tariffs on selected US goods and proposed setting zero tariffs on all industrial products for both sides.

Since then, however, negotiations have made little progress. The stalemate has deepened to the point where Trump even threatened to impose 50% tariffs on EU goods starting June 1.

26 June 2025

US: Trump Teases More Crypto Action in Prerecorded Coinbase Summit Address

Trump delivered a pre-recorded message to Coinbase’s State of Crypto Summit, marking only his second direct address to the crypto sector as president. He emphasised his commitment to implementing

Read More
7 March 2025

ST KITTS: IMF Recognizes Enhanced Sustainability Of St. Kitts And Nevis’ Citizenship By Investment Program

Basseterre, St. Kitts — The International Monetary Fund (IMF), in its 2025 Article IV Mission report, has acknowledged the enhanced sustainability of the St. Kitts- Nevis Citizenship by Investment

Read More
6 August 2024

UKRAINE: Ukrainian business and citizens boost investments in government bonds by UAH 16 billion in July

In July 2024, Ukraine’s Ministry of Finance raised UAH 38 billion through government bond issuance, comprising UAH 26.4 billion and USD 285.7 million. Of the total, UAH 35.5 billion were military

Read More
21 February 2025

CAYMAN ISLANDS: Changes made as beneficial ownership regime reworked

Premier Juliana O’Connor-Connolly presented changes to beneficial ownership legislation to parliament when it met for the last time before the elections. While the Beneficial Ownership Transparency

Read More