State lawmakers in California will convene Wednesday to debate Assembly Bill No. 259, a piece of progressive legislation introduced last year that would impose a worldwide wealth tax on residents with a net worth above $50 million (or $25 million for married taxpayers filing separately).
As summarized by its supporters, the bill imposes an annual 1% tax on a resident’s worldwide net worth in excess of $50 million. The bill would also impose, for taxable years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2026, an additional tax at a rate of 0.5% of a resident’s worldwide net worth in excess of $1 billion (or in excess of $500 million in the case of a married taxpayer filing separately).
The bill describes “worldwide net worth” with reference to specific federal provisions and would provide that worldwide net worth does not include certain assets including personal property situated out of state, directly held real property or liabilities related to directly held real property.
The bill would also authorize the state’s Franchise Tax Board to adopt regulations to carry out these provisions, including regulations regarding the valuation of certain assets that are not publicly traded. Further, the bill would require new certifications by taxpayers stating that they are meeting their tax liabilities, to be made under penalty of perjury.
Another feature in the bill would establish an entity called the Wealth Tax Advisory Council. If passed as introduced, the legislation would require the council to determine an adequate level of annual funding and staffing for the administration and collection of the wealth tax imposed by this bill.
Additionally, the bill would provide specific guidelines for what constitutes adequate levels of annual funding and staffing for the administration and collection of a wealth tax, and it would create “continuously appropriated funds” in the state treasury to cover the expenses of the administration and collection of the wealth tax.
Under existing California law, the False Claims Act provides that any person who commits certain types of fraud is liable to the state or to the political subdivision for three times the amount of damages that the state or political subdivision sustained because of the underlying act (and for the costs of a civil action brought to recover any penalties or damages).
Under this existing law, prosecutors are required to “diligently investigate violations of those specific acts involving state funds or political subdivision funds.”
The new bill would apply the provisions of the False Claims Act to claims, records or statements made in relation to the wealth tax imposed by the bill.
U.S. President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee to run the Internal Revenue Service, former Rep. Billy Long, didn’t serve on the House committee tasked with writing tax policy during his six
Climate finance will be on top of the agenda when world leaders gather in Baku, Azerbaijan this November for the 29th Conference of Parties (COP29) to discuss future climate action. At the climate conference,
The UK’s Regulatory Innovation Office is to work with the Digital Regulation Cooperation Forum to cut red tape for fintechs as they navigate complex regulation. Last year, the UK’s burgeoning
Amid international pressure, the BVI has published a new policy that guides access to the Register of Beneficial Ownership for BVI Business Companies and Limited Partnerships. According to the BVI government,